Medion Erazer Beast X25
RTX 3080 · 130W · Ryzen 9 5900HX
Head-to-head
Medion Erazer Beast X25 vs Schenker XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake is the faster machine, averaging 13% more frames across 7 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Medion Erazer Beast X25 | Schenker XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 | 126 | 154 | -28 |
| Far Cry 5 | 119 | 127 | -8 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 97 | 105 | -8 |
| GTA V | 157 | 172 | -15 |
| Strange Brigade | 180 | 221 | -41 |
| The Witcher 3 | 175 | 198 | -23 |
| X-Plane 11 | 72 | 83 | -11 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Medion Erazer Beast X25 | Schenker XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | — |
| GPU | RTX 3080 | RTX 3080 |
| GPU power | 130W | 165W |
| CPU | Ryzen 9 5900HX | Core i7-11800H |
| Memory | 64GB | 32GB |
| Display | 17.3in 1920x1080 | 15.6in 2560x1440 |
| Refresh | 240Hz | 165Hz |
| Weight | 2.27kg | 2.194kg |
| Score | Not scored - no UK price | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
RTX 3080 · 165W · Core i7-11800H