Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
RTX 3080 · 100W · Core i7-10875H
Head-to-head
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) vs Medion Erazer Beast X25
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) is the faster machine, averaging 14% more frames across 6 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | Medion Erazer Beast X25 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 | 139 | 126 | +13 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 109 | 97 | +12 |
| GTA V | 164 | 157 | +7 |
| Strange Brigade | 223 | 180 | +43 |
| The Witcher 3 | 208 | 175 | +33 |
| X-Plane 11 | 92 | 72 | +20 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £4,500 | — |
| GPU | RTX 3080 | RTX 3080 |
| GPU power | 100W | 130W |
| CPU | Core i7-10875H | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
| Memory | 32GB | 64GB |
| Display | 17.3in 3840x2160 | 17.3in 1920x1080 |
| Refresh | 120Hz | 240Hz |
| Weight | 2.958kg | 2.27kg |
| Score | 4.8 | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Medion Erazer Beast X25
RTX 3080 · 130W · Ryzen 9 5900HX