Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
RTX 5090 · Core Ultra 9 275HX
Head-to-head
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate vs Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25
Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 is the faster machine, averaging 13% more frames across 7 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 202 | 227 | -25 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 172 | 180 | -8 |
| Dota 2 | 193 | 275 | -82 |
| F1 25 | 241 | 291 | -50 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 205 | 208 | -3 |
| GTA V | 185 | 187 | -2 |
| X-Plane 11 | 114 | 134 | -20 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £4,884 | — |
| GPU | RTX 5090 | RTX 5090 |
| GPU power | - | - |
| CPU | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
| Memory | 32GB | 32GB |
| Display | 16in 2560x1600 | 16in 2560x1600 |
| Refresh | 300Hz | 300Hz |
| Weight | 2.834kg | 2.855kg |
| Score | 5.4 | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25
RTX 5090 · Ryzen 9 9955HX3D