Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
RTX 5090 · Core Ultra 9 275HX
Head-to-head
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate vs MSI Raider 16 Max HX
MSI Raider 16 Max HX is the faster machine, averaging 1% more frames across 6 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | MSI Raider 16 Max HX | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 202 | 211 | -9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 172 | 177 | -5 |
| Dota 2 | 193 | 190 | +3 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 205 | 205 | +0 |
| GTA V | 185 | 188 | -3 |
| X-Plane 11 | 114 | 113 | +1 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | MSI Raider 16 Max HX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £4,884 | — |
| GPU | RTX 5090 | RTX 5090 |
| GPU power | - | 175W |
| CPU | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX |
| Memory | 32GB | 32GB |
| Display | 16in 2560x1600 | 16in 2560x1600 |
| Refresh | 300Hz | 240Hz |
| Weight | 2.834kg | 2.655kg |
| Score | 5.4 | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
MSI Raider 16 Max HX
RTX 5090 · 175W · Core Ultra 9 290HX