Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
RTX 4070 · 110W · Core Ultra 9 185H
Head-to-head
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) is the faster machine, averaging 1% more frames across 4 games. Whether that's the one to buy depends on the £2,435 price gap.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 | 144 | 139 | +5 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 100 | 109 | -9 |
| GTA V | 166 | 164 | +2 |
| X-Plane 11 | 89 | 92 | -3 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £2,065 | £4,500 |
| GPU | RTX 4070 | RTX 3080 |
| GPU power | 110W | 100W |
| CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i7-10875H |
| Memory | 32GB | 32GB |
| Display | 16in 3200x2000 | 17.3in 3840x2160 |
| Refresh | 165Hz | 120Hz |
| Weight | 2.032kg | 2.958kg |
| Score | 5.6 | 4.8 |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
RTX 3080 · 100W · Core i7-10875H