Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
RTX 4070 · 110W · Core Ultra 9 185H
Head-to-head
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs Asus Zephyrus G14
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 is the faster machine, averaging 24% more frames across 4 games. Whether that's the one to buy depends on the £67 price gap.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | Asus Zephyrus G14 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 | 144 | 115 | +29 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 100 | 69 | +31 |
| GTA V | 166 | 134 | +32 |
| X-Plane 11 | 89 | 62 | +27 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | Asus Zephyrus G14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £2,065 | £2,132 |
| GPU | RTX 4070 | RTX 3060 |
| GPU power | 110W | 80W |
| CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
| Memory | 32GB | 16GB |
| Display | 16in 3200x2000 | 14in 1920x1080 |
| Refresh | 165Hz | 144Hz |
| Weight | 2.032kg | 1.68kg |
| Score | 5.6 | 5.1 |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Asus Zephyrus G14
RTX 3060 · 80W · Ryzen 9 5900HS