Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
RTX 3060 · 95W · Core i9-12900H
Head-to-head
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE vs Asus TUF Gaming F17
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE is the faster machine, averaging 12% more frames across 6 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | Asus TUF Gaming F17 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 | 162 | 135 | +27 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 79 | 72 | +7 |
| GTA V | 172 | 141 | +31 |
| Strange Brigade | 158 | 149 | +9 |
| The Witcher 3 | 146 | 141 | +5 |
| X-Plane 11 | 101 | 80 | +21 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | Asus TUF Gaming F17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | — |
| GPU | RTX 3060 | RTX 3060 |
| GPU power | 95W | 95W |
| CPU | Core i9-12900H | Core i9-11900H |
| Memory | 32GB | 16GB |
| Display | 14in 2880x1800 | 17.3in 1920x1080 |
| Refresh | 90Hz | 144Hz |
| Weight | 1.734kg | 2.65kg |
| Score | Not scored - no UK price | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Asus TUF Gaming F17
RTX 3060 · 95W · Core i9-11900H