Medion Erazer Beast X20
RTX 3070 · 140W · Core i7-10870H
Head-to-head
Medion Erazer Beast X20 vs Acer Nitro 5
Medion Erazer Beast X20 is the faster machine, averaging 14% more frames across 8 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Medion Erazer Beast X20 | Acer Nitro 5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dirt 5 | 105 | 86 | +19 |
| Dota 2 | 123 | 115 | +8 |
| Far Cry 5 | 110 | 101 | +9 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 92 | 79 | +13 |
| GTA V | 153 | 136 | +17 |
| Strange Brigade | 192 | 157 | +35 |
| The Witcher 3 | 180 | 141 | +39 |
| X-Plane 11 | 70 | 71 | -1 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Medion Erazer Beast X20 | Acer Nitro 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | — |
| GPU | RTX 3070 | RTX 3070 |
| GPU power | 140W | 85W |
| CPU | Core i7-10870H | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| Memory | 32GB | 16GB |
| Display | 17.3in 2560x1440 | 15.6in 2560x1440 |
| Refresh | 165Hz | 144Hz |
| Weight | 2.246kg | 2.3kg |
| Score | Not scored - no UK price | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Acer Nitro 5
RTX 3070 · 85W · Ryzen 7 5800H