Acer Nitro 14
RTX 4060 · 110W · Ryzen 5 8645HS
Head-to-head
Acer Nitro 14 vs Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 is the faster machine, averaging 3% more frames across 6 games. Whether that's the one to buy depends on the £426 price gap.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Acer Nitro 14 | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 103 | 95 | +8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 87 | 80 | +7 |
| Dota 2 | 126 | 144 | -18 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 106 | 100 | +6 |
| GTA V | 160 | 166 | -6 |
| X-Plane 11 | 73 | 89 | -16 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Acer Nitro 14 | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £1,634 | £2,060 |
| GPU | RTX 4060 | RTX 4070 |
| GPU power | 110W | 110W |
| CPU | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Memory | 16GB | 32GB |
| Display | 14.5in 2560x1600 | 16in 3200x2000 |
| Refresh | 120Hz | 165Hz |
| Weight | 1.983kg | 2.032kg |
| Score | 5.7 | 5.6 |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
RTX 4070 · 110W · Core Ultra 9 185H