LaptopGaming
Home / Compare / Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 vs Schenker XMG Core 16 M25

Head-to-head

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 vs Schenker XMG Core 16 M25

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 is the faster machine, averaging 38% more frames across 7 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.

Frame rates, side by side

Game Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 Schenker XMG Core 16 M25 Diff
Baldur's Gate 3227125+102
Cyberpunk 2077180105+75
Dota 2275145+130
F1 24357231+126
Final Fantasy XV208140+68
GTA V187134+53
X-Plane 1113488+46

1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.

Specifications

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25Schenker XMG Core 16 M25
Price——
GPURTX 5090RTX 5070
GPU power--
CPURyzen 9 9955HX3DRyzen AI 9 HX 370
Memory32GB64GB
Display16in 2560x160016in 2560x1600
Refresh300Hz300Hz
Weight2.855kg2.149kg
ScoreNot scored - no UK priceNot scored - no UK price

How these numbers were produced

Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.

Read the full reviews