Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1
RTX 5050 · Core 5 210H
Head-to-head
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 vs Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX is the faster machine, averaging 21% more frames across 7 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 87 | 164 | -77 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 88 | 118 | -30 |
| Dota 2 | 131 | 143 | -12 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 102 | 147 | -45 |
| GTA V | 170 | 122 | +48 |
| Strange Brigade | 220 | 322 | -102 |
| X-Plane 11 | 77 | 85 | -8 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | — |
| GPU | RTX 5050 | RTX 5090 |
| GPU power | - | 160W |
| CPU | Core 5 210H | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
| Memory | 16GB | 32GB |
| Display | 17.3in 1920x1080 | 16in 2560x1600 |
| Refresh | 144Hz | 240Hz |
| Weight | 2.706kg | 2.09kg |
| Score | Not scored - no UK price | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX
RTX 5090 · 160W · Ryzen AI 9 HX 370