LaptopGaming
Home / Compare / Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX

Head-to-head

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 is the faster machine, averaging 41% more frames across 9 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.

Frame rates, side by side

Game Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX Diff
Assassin's Creed Shadows9746+51
Baldur's Gate 3227107+120
Cyberpunk 207718092+88
Dota 2275151+124
F1 24357206+151
F1 25291153+138
Final Fantasy XV208121+87
GTA V187177+10
X-Plane 1113492+42

1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.

Specifications

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX
Price——
GPURTX 5090RTX 5060
GPU power--
CPURyzen 9 9955HX3DCore Ultra 7 255H
Memory32GB32GB
Display16in 2560x160016in 2880x1800
Refresh300Hz120Hz
Weight2.855kg1.929kg
ScoreNot scored - no UK priceNot scored - no UK price

How these numbers were produced

Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.

Read the full reviews