Asus V16
RTX 3050 · Core 7 240H
Head-to-head
Asus V16 vs MSI Cyborg 15
Asus V16 is the faster machine, averaging 0% more frames across 5 games. Whether that's the one to buy depends on the £216 price gap.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Asus V16 | MSI Cyborg 15 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 45 | 66 | -21 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 43 | 63 | -20 |
| Dota 2 | 147 | 83 | +64 |
| GTA V | 127 | 162 | -35 |
| X-Plane 11 | 79 | 67 | +12 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Asus V16 | MSI Cyborg 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £1,200 | £984 |
| GPU | RTX 3050 | RTX 5050 |
| GPU power | - | - |
| CPU | Core 7 240H | Core 7 240H |
| Memory | 16GB | 16GB |
| Display | 16in 1920x1200 | 15.6in 1920x1080 |
| Refresh | 144Hz | 144Hz |
| Weight | 1.974kg | 2.22kg |
| Score | 5.7 | 5.5 |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
MSI Cyborg 15
RTX 5050 · Core 7 240H