
Head-to-head
Razer Blade 14 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16
Razer Blade 14 is the faster machine, averaging 4% more frames across 8 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Razer Blade 14 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 131 | 134 | -3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 110 | 121 | -11 |
| Dota 2 | 145 | 129 | +16 |
| F1 24 | 229 | 234 | -5 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 138 | 142 | -4 |
| GTA V | 127 | 125 | +2 |
| Strange Brigade | 293 | 241 | +52 |
| X-Plane 11 | 83 | 81 | +2 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Razer Blade 14 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | — |
| GPU | RTX 5070 | RTX 5070 |
| GPU power | 115W | 115W |
| CPU | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Ryzen 7 260 |
| Memory | 32GB | 32GB |
| Display | 14in 2880x1800 | 16in 2560x1600 |
| Refresh | 120Hz | 165Hz |
| Weight | 1.615kg | 2.213kg |
| Score | Not scored - no UK price | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews

