Asus ProArt PX13
RTX 4070 · Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Head-to-head
Asus ProArt PX13 vs Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 is the faster machine, averaging 6% more frames across 6 games. Whether that's the one to buy depends on the £66 price gap.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Asus ProArt PX13 | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 73 | 95 | -22 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 86 | 80 | +6 |
| Dota 2 | 132 | 144 | -12 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 104 | 100 | +4 |
| GTA V | 167 | 166 | +1 |
| X-Plane 11 | 74 | 89 | -15 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Asus ProArt PX13 | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £1,999 | £2,065 |
| GPU | RTX 4070 | RTX 4070 |
| GPU power | - | 110W |
| CPU | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Memory | 32GB | 32GB |
| Display | 13.3in 2880x1800 | 16in 3200x2000 |
| Refresh | 60Hz | 165Hz |
| Weight | 1.389kg | 2.032kg |
| Score | 5.8 | 5.6 |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
RTX 4070 · 110W · Core Ultra 9 185H