
Head-to-head
Acer Nitro V 16 vs Asus TUF Gaming A15
Asus TUF Gaming A15 is the faster machine, averaging 9% more frames across 7 games. We haven't confirmed a UK price for both machines, so treat this as a performance comparison rather than a value one.
Frame rates, side by side
| Game | Acer Nitro V 16 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 83 | 96 | -13 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 77 | 83 | -6 |
| Dota 2 | 138 | 149 | -11 |
| Final Fantasy XV | 96 | 101 | -5 |
| GTA V | 168 | 168 | +0 |
| Strange Brigade | 200 | 213 | -13 |
| X-Plane 11 | 61 | 92 | -31 |
1920×1080, High preset, upscaling off. Source: Notebookcheck.
Specifications
| Acer Nitro V 16 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | — |
| GPU | RTX 4060 | RTX 4060 |
| GPU power | 85W | - |
| CPU | Ryzen 7 8845HS | Ryzen 9 8945H |
| Memory | 16GB | 16GB |
| Display | 16in 1920x1200 | 15.6in 1920x1080 |
| Refresh | 165Hz | 144Hz |
| Weight | 2.5kg | 2.122kg |
| Score | Not scored - no UK price | Not scored - no UK price |
How these numbers were produced
Frame rates here are not measured by us, and we label how each one was arrived at. A figure marked measured comes from a published run on that exact machine. A figure marked representative is derived from the GPU and its power limit (TGP) and cross-referenced against published reviews - a sound estimate of what that configuration delivers, but not a measurement of that specific laptop. Unless stated otherwise, numbers are 1920x1080, High preset, upscaling off. Where a laptop ships in several power configurations we use the wattage of the exact SKU listed, because a 140W RTX 5070 and a 115W one are not the same product.
Read the full reviews

